Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Nature Food ; 1(5):241, 2020.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2291287
2.
Coronaviruses ; 2(5) (no pagination), 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2250710

ABSTRACT

The ongoing pandemic of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) has created a major challenge for the public health worldwide. The reported cases indicate that the outbreak is more widespread than initially assumed. Around 18 million people have been infected with 689,000 reported deaths (August 2020;the number is increasing daily);with a high mutation rate, this virus poses an even more serious threat worldwide. The actual source of COVID-19 is still un-clear;even if the initial reports link it to the Chinese seafood wet market in Wuhan, other animals such as birds, snakes, and many small mammals including bats are also linked with this novel coro-navirus. The structure of the COVID-19 shows distinctive proteins among which spike proteins have a pivotal role in host cell attachment and virus-cell membrane fusion in order to facilitate virus infection. Currently, no specific antiviral treatment or vaccine is available. Various drug can-didates, including SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV protease inhibitors, neuraminidase inhibitors, RNA synthesis inhibitors, ACE2 inhibitors and lungs supportive therapy, are under trials. Cell-based therapy also appeared with remarkable treatment possibilities. In this article, we endeavored to succinctly cover the current and available treatment options, including pharmaceuticals, cell-based therapy, and traditional medicine. We also focused on the extent of damages by this novel coron-avirus in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh;the strategies adopted and the research activities initiat-ed so far by these densely populated countries (neighboring China) are explained in this review.Copyright © 2021 Bentham Science Publishers.

3.
Viruses ; 14(12)2022 12 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2171911

ABSTRACT

Southeast Asia is considered a global hotspot of emerging zoonotic diseases. There, wildlife is commonly traded under poor sanitary conditions in open markets; these markets have been considered 'the perfect storm' for zoonotic disease transmission. We assessed the potential of wildlife trade in spreading viral diseases by quantifying the number of wild animals of four mammalian orders (Rodentia, Chiroptera, Carnivora and Primates) on sale in 14 Indonesian wildlife markets and identifying zoonotic viruses potentially hosted by these animals. We constructed a network analysis to visualize the animals that are traded alongside each other that may carry similar viruses. We recorded 6725 wild animals of at least 15 species on sale. Cities and markets with larger human population and number of stalls, respectively, offered more individuals for sale. Eight out of 15 animal taxa recorded are hosts of 17 zoonotic virus species, nine of which can infect more than one species as a host. The network analysis showed that long-tailed macaque has the greatest potential for spreading viral diseases, since it is simultaneously the most traded species, sold in 13/14 markets, and a potential host for nine viruses. It is traded alongside pig-tailed macaques in three markets, with which it shares six viruses in common (Cowpox, Dengue, Hepatitis E, Herpes B, Simian foamy, and Simian retrovirus type D). Short-nosed fruit bats and large flying foxes are potential hosts of Nipah virus and are also sold in large quantities in 10/14 markets. This study highlights the need for better surveillance and sanitary conditions to avoid the negative health impacts of unregulated wildlife markets.


Subject(s)
Carnivora , Chiroptera , Communicable Diseases , Virus Diseases , Viruses , Animals , Humans , Animals, Wild , Rodentia , Indonesia/epidemiology , Primates , Zoonoses , Virus Diseases/epidemiology , Virus Diseases/veterinary
4.
International Journal of Services, Economics and Management ; 13(4):358-377, 2022.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2197265

ABSTRACT

Since early 2020, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a global pandemic. This disease spreads through person-to-person by physical contact, thus physical distancing is effective to prevent the virus transmission. The retailers in the traditional wet market cannot adapt to this policy due to the lack of internet literature while most of the customers change to online shopping habits. Furthermore, the decreasing number of transactions in the market may lead to bigger problems such as expiring products, prices fluctuation, and inflation. This research formulates a supply chain model with a barter scheme and third party to connect the retailer and online customers. The barter scheme allows retailers to exchange their products with other products for living and reduce the risk of loss caused by expired products, while the third party promotes online sales and manages the barter in the system. Copyright © 2022 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.

5.
Ocean Coast Manag ; 213: 105852, 2021 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1370659

ABSTRACT

A farm-level survey and a market survey were conducted in China to study the impact of the COVID-19 on the shellfish supply chain in the early stage of the pandemic in 2020. 114 farms of 36 cites participated in an online survey from mid-July to late August, and 23 markets in five cities were investigated from June to November. The series results are expected to provide an insight for the fisheries and aquaculture sector to mitigate the impact of the pandemic on participants in the shellfish supply chain and to improve of the ability of the government to respond to such events in the future. Shellfish farmers and sellers have experienced a sharp drop in profits, largely due to shrinking demand. Relying on local employees and suppliers, shellfish farming activities have rapidly resumed since the gradual reopening from February. Nevertheless, demand has been slow to recover due to public concern about contamination of seafood with the virus. Additionally, we analyzed the ability and attitude of farms of different size to cope with the pandemic and the plight of shellfish sellers, and discussed government supports for different size farms and improvements in seafood distribution channels.

6.
Trends Microbiol ; 29(7): 573-581, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1130313

ABSTRACT

Emerging zoonotic diseases exert a significant burden on human health and have considerable socioeconomic impact worldwide. In Asia, live animals as well as animal products are commonly sold in informal markets. The interaction of humans, live domestic animals for sale, food products, and wild and scavenging animals, creates a risk for emerging infectious diseases. Such markets have been in the spotlight as sources of zoonotic viruses, for example, avian influenza viruses and coronaviruses, Here, we bring data together on the global impact of live and wet markets on the emergence of zoonotic diseases. We discuss how benefits can be maximized and risks minimized and conclude that current regulations should be implemented or revised, to mitigate the risk of new diseases emerging in the future.


Subject(s)
Commerce/standards , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/etiology , Food , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/transmission , Zoonoses/transmission , Animals , Asia , Birds/virology , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/virology , Commerce/legislation & jurisprudence , Commerce/methods , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/prevention & control , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/virology , Crowding , Humans , Influenza in Birds/transmission , Influenza in Birds/virology , Influenza, Human/virology , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/virology , Zoonoses/classification , Zoonoses/virology
7.
Food Ethics ; 5(1): 17, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-680006

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought to light significant failures and fragilities in our food, health, and market systems. Concomitantly, it has emphasized the urgent need for a critical re-evaluation of many of the policies and practices that have created the conditions in which viral pathogens can spread. However, there are many factors that are complicating this process; among others, the uncertain, rapidly evolving, and often poorly reported science surrounding the virus' origins has contributed to a politically charged and often rancorous public debate, which is concerning insofar as the proliferation of divisive discourse may hinder efforts to address complex and collective concerns in a mutually cooperative manner. In developing ethical and effective responses to the disproportionate risks associated with certain food production and consumption practices, we argue that the focus should be on mitigating such risks wherever they arise, instead of seeking to ascribe blame to specific countries or cultures. To this end, this article is an effort to inject some nuance into contemporary conversations about COVID-19 and its broader implications, particularly when it comes to trade in wildlife, public health, and food systems reform. If COVID-19 is to represent a turning point towards building a more equitable, sustainable, and resilient world for both humans and nonhuman animals alike, the kind of fractioning that is currently being exacerbated by the use of loaded terms such as "wet market" must be eschewed in favour of a greater recognition of our fundamental interconnectedness.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL